Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter! Recent Articles
Best of Ken Adams
|
Gaming Guru
With each new generation of Indian gaming, state and local legislators tried to find ways to “level the playing field” for the non-Indian operations. Over time most of those efforts have failed, mostly because the tribes even with the efforts of the legislators have managed to stay ahead of competition with the types of gaming, number of games, and limits that they can offer. There are other issues that contribute to the situation and the gradual decline of non-Indian forms of gaming. The obvious one is taxation; local operators pay a tax that the tribes do not pay. Another issue, one that is beginning to play itself out in other states as well, is anti-smoking legislation. Washington has banned smoking in all public places, but cannot ban it in Indian casinos. That certainly tips the balance even further in favor of the tribes.
The tribes have been responsible and productive citizens of the state even if they have not paid taxes directly on their gaming revenue. Besides the people employed by the casinos, the tribes buy their supplies from the local community, and by compact contribute approximately 2 percent of their table revenue to local charities. And as the casinos’ profits substantially improve the living situation on reservations where the standard of living prior to Indian gaming was significantly below the rest of the state, the tribes are diversifying and creating other businesses that also make important contributions to the local economy.
If Indian gaming in Washington, with just 29 tribes and 33 casinos, is that important, just how important is Indian gaming in California, with over 56 casinos and close to 60,000 slot machines? Important enough for Governor Schwarzenegger, when he took office, to base part of his proposed financial turn-around on revenues from tribal casinos. He didn’t quite get what he predicted – in fact he has not managed to get much yet. But therein, as the famous bard said, lies the tale. Arnold has been back at the bargaining table, willing this time to grant some significant concessions, while at the same time not tolerating any attempt by tribes to make an end run around him and operate any “gray” games at all. He made significant progress in August, announcing within a week, six new agreements that would gain the state billions of dollars over time and permit nearly another 25,000 slot machines. Unfortunately for the governor and the tribes, the “guys” in Sacramento have the final say and they won’t. Won’t what? Won’t say – anything, except that they were annoyed by the timing and didn’t like the labor component of the agreements.
The failure of the compacts to get legislative endorsement does not necessarily mean they are dead; it just means that for this year, if not dead, they are in a coma. Just as gaming is gaining more prominence in elections in many states, Indian gaming is a significant political issue in those states with Indian gaming. In Washington and Oklahoma, there are Indians serving as representatives in the state legislature. The tribes have money and they spend it in their best interests and that includes electing people who are sympathetic to their cause. We can expect more tribal members to be elected and eventually to have them also serving in Washington, D.C. Gaming is part of our culture, and it is becoming more of a factor in politics, not in the backroom way of Jack Abramoff and his associates, but in the “up front at the ballot box way” that is at the heart of American politics. Abramoff hurt gaming, and he hurt Indian gaming, but the Abramoff effect as it is being called will eventually pass. We don’t need another of his ilk, but we do need representation. Gaming needs incumbent and prospective elective officials who are willing to stand up and represent gaming openly. The industry needs to get over its embarrassment and unwillingness to stand in the spotlight and make its case. Gaming pays billions of dollars in taxes and contributes billions more in other expenses and ancillary industries; gaming employs hundreds of thousands of people. In New Jersey the casino workers are being wooed as a block to express, at the polls, their dissatisfaction with the politicians who allowed the casinos to close, which caused the workers to lose wages, benefits, and tips. Every state with gaming casino employees should be encouraged to vote to support their industry, just as autoworkers, steelworkers, and members of other unions vote to support their industries and jobs. Gaming may be vulnerable to the uncertainties of politics, but it would be less so if all of its employees, investors, and other beneficiaries voted for its best interests. But now, that is simply my opinion, isn’t it? Ken
|
Ken Adams |