Newsletter Signup
Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter! Recent Articles
Best of Ken Adams
|
Gaming Guru
Nothing significant has happened in Washington as the members of the House and Congress, the President and his cabinet and everyone else with a cause and pulpit spent October campaigning. That does not mean they won't return and return to making laws that will impact Indian gaming.
Still Indian gaming continues to evolve, each jurisdiction in its own unique ways. Here are a couple of stories that in a way are typical of the entire history of Indian gaming. The first one is from Cache Creek Casino in northern California. The tribe is closing its bingo parlor, the very place that gave the tribe its start in gaming over 20 years ago. Bingo isn't being closed because it is no longer popular or profitable, but because slot machines and poker are more popular and more profitable and the tribe needs the space to expand.
The second story is not quite so heart warming, but it does give a glimpse into why you often hear how tribes have to be very careful when choosing anyone to "help" them get started in the casino business. The Snoqualmie Tribe of Washington had an agreement with an Arizona company to jointly open a casino near Seattle. The deal fell apart for undisclosed reasons, so the tribe bought the land the company had originally purchased for the tribe for the purpose of placing it in trust to use for a casino. The problem lies not in the failed negotiations, but rather in the price; the land purchased for $3.8 million just three years ago was sold to the tribe for $50.8 million. Call me naïve, but 13 times the original price seems a bit excessive in my mind.
And then, from Michigan, the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians are in the process of building a $400 million casino – it is expected to open in June of 2007. That is about 5 or 6 years later than it should have opened. Good lobbying and some well spent attorneys' fees have kept the tribe from opening its casino. Just how much did that cost the tribe?
Last year, when Oklahoma approved compacts for Class III slot machines with the state sharing in the revenue from all Class III activities, state officials started immediately to calculate the revenue for the state and to put that money into the state budget. But the state officials did not consult with the tribes; the tribes had been very successfully operating Class II games and were not in any hurry to cut the state into the action. On October 24th, 2006, the Citizen Potawatomi Nation opened the state's first casino with all Class III slots. The process of converting the rest of the state's Class II games to Class III is ongoing, but at the tribes' pace, not the state's.
In Florida, it seems the federal government is going to break the stalemate over Class III games. The Seminole Tribe has been trying since the early 1990s to get a compact with the State of Florida. The tribe tried to sue the state but was told by the United States Supreme Court that the State of Florida had sovereign immunity and was protected by the constitution from the suit. That decision in effect took the teeth from the National Indian Regulatory Act by eliminating any but federal intervention options for a tribe faced with a state government that refused to "negotiate in good faith." Well over ten years later it would appear the federal government is going to intervene and allow the Seminoles to operate Class III; and unlike the long-time-coming compacts in Oklahoma, this one will not come with a rich revenue sharing agreement. So far, no time frame for the introduction of the Class III games is known. But, just as the case with the Potawatomi in Michigan, one is obligated to ask just how much revenue was lost to the Seminoles because of the state's stalling tactics?
Indian gaming in Florida appears to be on the edge of dramatic change; the November elections should help, not just in Florida, but also in California. Both states will have governors that favor gaming and will likely be working to sign and get approved new compacts. Congress will be back and there will be some new personalities, and without an upcoming election, a lobbyist scandal (although federal prosecutors are still trying to keep Abramoff out of jail so he can help them find others tainted by his activities) and other short-term political pressure, Congress may act more rationally toward gaming in general and Indian gaming in particular. At least we can hope, can't we? But now, that is simply my opinion, isn't it?
|
Ken Adams |